Review removal for attorneys and law firms

A firm is reviewed by the people it acted against. The other side was never your client, and privilege means you cannot answer them in public. Platform policy can.

Who this covers
Attorneys and law firms
The usual damage
The opposing party
Upfront fee
None
You are invoiced for
Verified removals only
In short

Can a law firm remove a review left by the opposing party?

It is a case worth taking on: the opposing party was never a client, and platform policy requires a customer experience. Erase Trax never needs any matter detail, so privilege and confidentiality are not breached. A former client unhappy with the outcome generally stays. The platform decides; the audit is free and only verified removals are invoiced.

In this trade

What goes wrong for attorneys and law firms

The other side of the case

The losing party reviews the firm as though it had acted for them.

Being on the receiving end of your client’s case is not a customer experience, and platform policy requires one.

A county courthouse with white columns and wide front steps.
  1. Your client’s caseYou act for one side
  2. It goes your client’s wayIn court or in the deal
  3. The other side is angryNever your client
  4. They review the firmAs if you had acted for them

And then the review“These people lied in court and ruined my family.”

  1. What a case may name
    • Never a client
    • A different firm
    • Abuse of a named lawyer
    • Personal details
    • The same text under several accounts
    Never included
    • The client file
    • Matter detail
    • Who your client was

    What a case may contain, and what it never does

    No file, no matter detail, no argument about the merits: the moderator is not a court.

  2. Former client4 reviews

    Lost my case and they still sent the full bill.

    Stays up
    The firm’s reply

    Thank you for taking the time to write. We would welcome the chance to discuss your concerns privately; please call our office.

    • Confirms nothing
    • Offers a private route

    The client who lost

    A former client whose case did not go their way writes a genuine, angry review.

    It stays, and we say so at the audit. The platform does not judge the outcome; a short, neutral reply is the route.

  3. Your name, searched
    • A complaints site
    • A forum thread
    • A post headed with a partner’s name
    • Your review profiles

    Where your name is searched

    Often the damage is a page (a complaints site, a forum thread, a post headed with a partner’s name) on the first page for that name. That is separate work, and the audit says which problem you have.

Examples and names are illustrative. The platform makes every final decision.

How we work

Four stages. The invoice is the last one.

  1. Free audit

    Every review on the firm’s and the individual lawyers’ profiles read against platform policy. For each, one question to you that discloses nothing: client, opposing party, or neither. Verdict in writing, including what stays.

  2. Case opened

    Every policy-violating review is handled for you. You confirm who the reviewer was; no matter detail is ever asked for.

  3. The platform decides

    You see where each one stands. The platform makes the final decision.

  4. Removed. Now you pay.

    Only for removals verified on your live profile.

  1. The opposing party in a case reviewed the firm. Can that come down?

    It is a case worth taking on. They were never a client, and platform policy requires a customer experience. The platform decides. Where the review describes direct dealings with the firm (a letter they received, a call to your office), some platforms treat that as an interaction and keep it, and we say so at the audit rather than after you have waited.

  2. Can you take it on without breaching client confidentiality or privilege?

    Yes, and that is the only way we work. Nothing from a matter is ever shared. All we need is your confirmation that the reviewer was not a client; never who your client was, what the case was, or how it ended. If a review could only be challenged by disclosing any of that, we do not take it on.

  3. Should the firm reply to the review?

    Yes, briefly. A short, neutral reply that confirms nothing (not whether the person was a client, not what the matter was) and offers a private route is the usual approach. Saying “this person was never a client” can itself reveal who was. Your professional conduct obligations on public statements apply and you know them better than we do.

  4. A former client whose case was lost left a one-star review. Is that removable?

    Generally not. They were a client, and an honest account of being unhappy with the outcome is allowed even where it is unfair. What can still be challenged is anything in it that violates policy on its own: abuse of a named lawyer, a threat, personal details. Beyond that the answer is a neutral reply and the reviews of clients who were satisfied and said nothing.

  5. A complaints website has a page about one of our partners, and it ranks for their name.

    That is rarely a removal. Sites of that kind seldom take pages down on request, and treating them as reviews goes nowhere. The route is ranking pages the firm owns above it for that name, which is slower, separate work. The audit tells you which problem you have; a firm often has both.

  6. Do you offer law firm reputation management, or only removal?

    Both, as separate services. Law firm reputation management also covers what comes up when a client searches a partner’s name, and replies that stay within privilege. Removal is billed only once verified; monitoring and search work are weekly, with no fixed term.

Find out which of your reviews can come down.

Free audit, a written verdict, nothing to pay upfront.