Why summarising makes an old problem worse
For years a bad review sat among your others, under a star rating that kept it in proportion, above a reply where you gave your side. That context did quiet work protecting you.
Stars disappear
A star rating is a proportion built from many voices. Prose is not. “Some customers reported billing issues” reads the same whether it came from one fake account or thirty honest ones.
Your reply does not travel with it
The thoughtful response you wrote sits under the review. It rarely makes it into a two-sentence summary.
Specific accusations get picked up first
Vague grumbling gets smoothed over. A detailed, confident, invented claim condenses easily, which is exactly the wrong kind of content to be repeated.
Burying it under new reviews stops working
Diluting a bad average with fresh positive ones used to be the advice. It helps far less when a specific claim can be quoted directly.
